Stardrives and Spinoza
نویسنده
چکیده
There are several senses in which one may speak of limits in relation to Physics. For the purposes of this essay, it is most useful to begin with the technological limitations of practical human activity. In this context, Physics both provides positive and negative information. Physical laws tell us how to achieve some goals, and informs us that others are forever out of reach. An excellent historical example is the science of thermodynamics. On the one hand, it tells us how to construct heat engines, on the other, it provides us with the Carnotic limit on efficiency, and rules out perpetual motion machines of both kinds. So Physics both extends our limits and helps us to understand them. Despite the annoying tendency of popular authors to tell us that anything is possible, the laws of Physics act as negative limits, and this is one of the great services of science to humanity. One may also ask about the limits of our knowledge, i.e. of physical theory. Is it almost finished, as Feynman insisted, does it end in a non-predictive theory, as we sometimes hear from string theorists, or is there a final theory yet to be discovered? Finally, we can discuss the limits of Science in relationship to other intellectual disciplines, such as Philosophy and Theology. In this essay, we shall present possible end results of Physics in the different senses we discussed above: our practical possibilities, our understanding of nature, and the role of Physics in our intellectual and (for want of a better phrase) spiritual life; and show that they are closely interwoven. We shall outline this network of ideas here, then discuss them in detail in the rest of the essay. We begin by discussing a family of potential practical applications of Theoretical Physics, namely the creation of artificial black holes (ABH’s), and their use as powerplants and stardrives [1]. This is suggested by classical general relativity and quantum field theory, but in order to see if it is truly possible, we will need a quantum theory of gravity, and moreover, one which can be put in a certain form, as we shall discuss below. Black holes, according to Hawking, are not really black. They radiate a thermal bath because of quantum field effects on the boundary [2]. For astronomical black holes the power is minuscule, but for microscopic ones it can be enormous. We have investigated whether there is a size range which is both useful and possible to produce, and found that the answer is a qualified yes. This proposal is extremely difficult technically. However, it seems that it is actually the least difficult possible approach to transporting human beings to the
منابع مشابه
Spinoza on Method
By interrupting the traditional approach to the distinctiveness of the order of knowledge and the order of nature (which was the procedure of many philosophers like Aristotle, and his scholastic disciples, more especially of Thomas Aquinas and even Descartes and Cartesian), and acquiring a unified science, Spinoza changes the customary order of philosophizing and begins his famous book, Ethics,...
متن کاملSpinoza and Kant on Suicide
In this paper I’m going to argue that both, Spinoza and Kant, construct the argument “for the impossibility of self-destruction” and examine how the concept of suicide relates to the concept of humanity in both philosophers. I will argue that Kant’s and Spinoza’s argument for the impossibility of self-destruction follows from the “external cause” premise and not from “the same subject” premise....
متن کاملE Differential Point of View of the Infinitesimal Calculus in Spinoza, Leibniz Anddeleuze
In Hegel au Spinosa:' Pierre Macherey challenges the influence of Hegel's reading of Spinoza by stressing the degree to which Spinoza eludes the grasp of the Hegelian dialectical progression of the history of philosophy. He argues that Hegel provides a defensive misreading of Spinoza, and that he had to "misread him" in order to maintain his subjective idealism. The suggestion being that Spinoz...
متن کاملIn Spinoza ’ S Philosophy of Mind
Axiom 6 of Part I of Spinoza’s Ethics, in the most widely used English translation, reads: “a true idea must agree with its object.” Spinoza also claims in Part II of the Ethics that every idea has an object with which it is parallel in an “order and connection” of causes (E2p7, E2p11, E2p13)—and, indeed, with which it is identical or “one and same” (E2p7s, E2p21s). Jonathan Bennett has maintai...
متن کامل